Sunday, April 12, 2009

Why Cameron should be insisting that Brown DOESN'T need to apologise

As I listened to the media coverage of the Damian McBride/Derek Draper affair this morning, I knew for certain what David Cameron's reaction would be.

We could confidently expect a terse statement along the following lines:

As Mr McBride no longer works for the government, the Conservative Party fully accepts that Gordon Brown and the Labour party can't reasonably be expected to comment and as far as we are concerned that's the end of the matter.

How could I be so sure? Well, when former Conservative candidate for Watford Ian Oakley was convicted for spreading anonymous smears against political opponents (of a rather worse nature than those in the McBride-Draper email), and mounting a sustained campaign of harrassment and criminal damage against them, the Conservatives were reported as saying the following:

A spokesman for the Conservatives said they could not comment on the issue as Oakley was no longer a member of the party.

It is rather odd, therefore, that the BBC website reports Cameron as being 'furious' and calling on Gordon Brown to 'give a guarantee that such messages will not be sent again'. Meanwhile William Hague has 'demanded an apology from the prime minister'. It seems that the official Conservative view about smearing political opponents has temporarily slipped their memories and perhaps the Conservative Central Office aparatchik who released the statement on Oakley should remind them.

By any standards, however repellent McBride's behaviour may be, it pales into insignificance when compared to Oakley's. Unlike Oakley, McBride did not personally make his poisonous material public, he has offered some kind of public statement of regret, and a Labour cabinet minister has repudiated his behaviour (albeit with in my view quite a bit of dissembling).

In contrast, none of Oakley's erstwhile colleages in Watford Conservatives have expressed regret for his behaviour. Cameron now has apologised, but not until seven months after the conviction, and even then only after being directly asked by a member of the public in a way that meant he could hardly avoid doing so. And he certainly didn't offer a guarantee that it wouldn't happen again along the lines that he now demands of Gordon Brown.

Of course the BBC news report cited above probably doesn't quote the whole of the Conservative party's statement on this matter. Perhaps in full it reads:

The Conservative party are furious and believe that Gordon Brown should apologise for Mr McBride's behaviour, but we accept that first of all he should pretend it's nothing to do with him, that any apology should only be made after several months have gone by and even then issued only if the prime minister is put in a position by a member of the public where it would seem churlish and mean-spirited not to express regret.


♥♥♥♥♥ Jennifer™® ♥♥♥♥♥ said...

your blog is very nice

Paul said...

I think the interesting way the Tories worked.

First that Gordon Brown and his advisers should be concentrating on the economy not planting smears.

Once they had succeeded in drawing blood, they then spent days putting pressure on Brown.

If they believed he should be working on the economy then as you say that should have been the end of it after the resignation.

wsxwhx718 said...

華人影音視訊聊天情人網 -
打手槍 -
情色網站 -
情色網 -
成人網站 -
夢工廠成人影音 -
辣妹聊天室 -
av女優 -
金瓶梅免費影片 -
色情視訊 -
視訊交友視訊秀 -
日本美少女 -
大陸美少女 -
自拍台灣自拍 -
視訊聊天影音聊天 -
美女掰穴 -
淫妹掰穴 -
視訊辣妹 -
18sex -
日本a片 -
火辣美女 -
辣妹妹 -
影音視訊 -
聊天室 -
辣妹視訊 -
18限 -
視訊美女 -
視訊辣妹 -
打炮 -
自慰套 -
情色愛愛 -
女生自慰 -
一夜情 -
台灣色情網 -
口交 -
成人影音聊天 -
成人色情網 -
裸體情色聊天室 -
視訊網愛聊天室 -
辣妹視訊秀 -

marry said...

Blogs are so informative where we get lots of information on any topic. Nice job keep it up!!

Accounting Dissertation

didi said...